China’s Internal Economic Turmoil:- Series of Deterrent
Image by :- SCMP
China, a global economic and geopolitical powerhouse, is facing significant internal economic challenges in recent years. The slowdown in GDP growth, real estate crises, youth unemployment, and diminishing consumer confidence have created internal pressures on Beijing. Historically, nations facing domestic turmoil often redirect attention to external issues, and China is no exception. For decades, it has employed various tactics to manage its border disputes with neighbors like Nepal, India, and Bhutan, exploiting periods of economic strain to maintain strategic dominance and distract from internal vulnerabilities.
This article explores how China’s internal economic turmoil intertwines with its border diplomacy, drawing on past and present examples to illustrate how Beijing uses its influence and tactics to deter its neighbors.
Historical Context: China’s Border Disputes
China shares borders with 14 countries, and many of these boundaries have been contested since its establishment as the People's Republic of China in 1949. The disputes with India, Nepal, and Bhutan, among others, stem from colonial-era treaties, undefined borders, and territorial ambitions.
Sino-Indian War (1962): This was the first major military conflict between China and India over disputed territories in Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh. It revealed Beijing’s strategy of combining military aggression with diplomatic maneuvering. The conflict coincided with internal upheavals in China, including the disastrous Great Leap Forward.
Bhutan: China began pressing territorial claims in Bhutan in the 1980s, leveraging Bhutan's lack of military capability and political dependence on India. By proposing "package deals" and conducting incursions into disputed territories, China aimed to weaken Bhutan's ties with India.
Nepal: Though China has largely maintained cordial ties with Nepal, it has occasionally pressured the country over border disputes in regions like Humla. China’s economic investments in Nepal under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) also come with strategic undertones, aimed at countering Indian influence in the region.
Present-Day Tactics in the Face of Economic Turmoil
China’s current economic slowdown is seen as its most severe since the reform era began in the late 1970s. While these internal issues present challenges for Beijing, they also provide an opportunity to project strength externally. Here’s how China continues to deter its neighbors amid its economic distress:
1. Strategic Military Posturing
India: Border skirmishes along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) have intensified since 2020, with the Galwan Valley clash marking a significant escalation. Even as China grapples with an economic slowdown, it continues to upgrade infrastructure near disputed areas, including roads, bridges, and airstrips. This serves a dual purpose: demonstrating its resolve and complicating India's defensive planning.
2. Bhutan: In recent years, China has built villages and roads in disputed territories near Bhutan. Such incursions are designed to create new facts on the ground, forcing Bhutan to negotiate from a weaker position.
3. Nepal: China has conducted low-key incursions into Nepalese territories, including constructing buildings on contested land in Humla. These actions often go unchallenged, as Nepal relies heavily on Chinese economic assistance.
2. Economic Leverage and Soft Power Diplomacy
Debt Diplomacy: Through the Belt and Road Initiative, China has invested heavily in Nepal and other neighboring countries. These projects, while boosting local infrastructure, often lead to debt dependency. For example, Nepal has signed multiple agreements with China under the BRI, giving Beijing a foothold in the country’s strategic infrastructure.
Trade Dominance: China has used trade as a tool to gain influence over its neighbors. For instance, it has become Nepal’s second-largest trade partner, reducing Kathmandu’s economic reliance on India.
Bhutan: Although Bhutan has been cautious about engaging with China, Beijing has offered economic incentives, such as potential trade routes, to lure Bhutan away from its dependence on India.
3. Diplomatic Pressures
Negotiations with Bhutan: In recent years, China has intensified efforts to negotiate a border settlement with Bhutan. While these talks are framed as peaceful, the underlying goal is to carve out space for strategic infrastructure that would bring Chinese forces closer to the Siliguri Corridor—India’s vulnerable “Chicken’s Neck.”
Nepal’s Political Divide: China has skillfully leveraged Nepal's internal political divisions to its advantage. By supporting pro-China factions, Beijing ensures that Nepal remains neutral or supportive in regional disputes, undermining India’s influence.
Multilateral Forums: Beijing uses its presence in regional forums like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and the BRICS to project itself as a stabilizing force, despite its aggressive behavior on the ground.
4. Psychological Warfare and Propaganda
China employs propaganda to portray itself as a victim of aggression, particularly in disputes with India. State-run media and social platforms amplify this narrative, painting India as the provocateur in border skirmishes. By framing disputes in this way, China seeks to garner international support or at least neutralize global criticism.
Case Studies: Nepal, India, and Bhutan
Nepal
In 2021, reports surfaced that China had constructed buildings in the Humla district, a disputed territory along the Nepal-China border. While Nepal’s government initially denied the claims, subsequent investigations suggested Chinese encroachments. These incidents reflect China’s approach to quietly altering the status quo in its favor, leveraging Nepal’s economic dependency to suppress opposition.
India
The standoff in eastern Ladakh since 2020 is a prime example of China’s aggressive tactics. Despite numerous rounds of diplomatic talks, Beijing has refused to restore the pre-2020 status quo, instead consolidating its positions. This behavior indicates China’s preference for protracted disputes that keep adversaries off-balance.
Bhutan
China’s construction of villages in disputed areas, such as near the Doklam plateau, has heightened tensions in the region. These actions directly challenge Bhutan’s sovereignty and indirectly target India’s security interests, as control over Doklam could threaten the Siliguri Corridor.
South and East China Sea:- Beijing uses intimidation to undermine the sovereign rights of Southeast Asian coastal states in the South China Sea, bully them out of offshore resources, threaten them out of shipping lanes, assert unilateral dominion, and deprive fishermen of access to their livelihoods.
China’s Endgame: Regional Dominance Amid Domestic Weakness
While China’s economic troubles might suggest a reduced capacity for external aggression, the opposite appears true. Beijing sees its border disputes as an avenue to project strength and rally nationalist sentiment at home. This strategy, however, is fraught with risks:
Regional Backlash: Countries like India have responded to China’s actions with increased military spending and closer ties with the United States and other Quad members.
Economic Overextension: China’s BRI projects have drawn criticism for creating debt traps, potentially alienating smaller nations like Nepal.
Global Reputation: Aggressive border tactics undermine Beijing’s claims of peaceful rise, potentially isolating it diplomatically.
Conclusion
China’s internal economic turmoil has not diminished its resolve to assert territorial claims against neighbors like Nepal, India, and Bhutan. Instead, it has reinforced Beijing’s reliance on border disputes as a tool for distraction and dominance. Through military posturing, economic leverage, diplomatic pressures, and propaganda, China continues to deter its neighbors, often at the cost of regional stability.
As the global balance of power shifts, neighboring countries must remain vigilant, balancing engagement with deterrence to counter China’s multifaceted strategies. Only by fostering regional unity and leveraging global alliances can they hope to manage the challenges posed by Beijing’s border diplomacy.
Comments
Post a Comment